tulip: be grown for distribution

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents flower
Weight: 0.70
, bulb
Weight: 0.69
, plant
Weight: 0.64
, thing
Weight: 0.51
, motif
Weight: 0.50
Siblings peony
Weight: 0.38
, hydrangea
Weight: 0.37
, chrysanthemum
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be grown for distribution 1.00
be grown for commercial distribution 0.95
be grown from seed 0.78
grow year 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(tulip, be grown for distribution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(tulip, be grown for distribution)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(tulip, be grown for distribution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(tulip, be grown for commercial distribution)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(tulip, be grown for distribution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(tulip, be grown for commercial distribution)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(tulip, be grown for distribution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(tulip, be grown for commercial distribution)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(tulip, be grown for distribution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(tulip, be grown for commercial distribution)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(tulip, be grown for distribution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(tulip, grow year)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(tulip, be grown for distribution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(tulip, be grown from seed)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(tulip, be grown for distribution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(tulip, grow year)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(tulip, be grown for distribution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(tulip, be grown from seed)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(tulip, be grown for distribution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(tulip, be grown from seed)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(tulip, be grown for distribution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(tulip, be grown from seed)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(tulip, be grown for distribution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(tulip, grow year)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(tulip, be grown for distribution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(tulip, grow year)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(tulip, be grown for distribution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(tulip, be grown for distribution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(tulip, be grown for distribution)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(tulip, be grown for distribution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(tulip, be grown for distribution)