tulip: stems droop

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents flower
Weight: 0.70
, bulb
Weight: 0.69
, plant
Weight: 0.64
, thing
Weight: 0.51
, motif
Weight: 0.50
Siblings peony
Weight: 0.38
, hydrangea
Weight: 0.37
, chrysanthemum
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
stems droop 1.00
droop 0.90
droop in vase 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(tulip, stems droop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(hydrangea, droop)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(tulip, stems droop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(peony, droop)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(tulip, stems droop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(peony, droop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(peony, droop)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(tulip, stems droop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(hydrangea, droop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(hydrangea, droop)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(tulip, stems droop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(tulip, stems droop)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(tulip, stems droop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(tulip, droop)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(tulip, stems droop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(tulip, droop)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(tulip, stems droop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(tulip, droop)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(tulip, stems droop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(tulip, droop in vase)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(tulip, stems droop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(tulip, droop in vase)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(tulip, stems droop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(tulip, droop in vase)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(tulip, stems droop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(tulip, droop)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(tulip, stems droop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(tulip, droop in vase)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(tulip, stems droop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(tulip, stems droop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(tulip, stems droop)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(tulip, stems droop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(tulip, stems droop)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(tulip, stems droop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(peony, droop)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(tulip, stems droop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(hydrangea, droop)