tuna: be at market

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fish
Weight: 0.68
, food
Weight: 0.65
, dish
Weight: 0.62
, staple
Weight: 0.59
, dairy product
Weight: 0.56
Siblings herring
Weight: 0.37
, salmon
Weight: 0.37
, chinook salmon
Weight: 0.37
, catfish
Weight: 0.37
, seafood
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at market 1.00
be buy at market 0.94
be at farmer market 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(fish, be at market)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(tuna, be at market)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(food, be buy at market)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(tuna, be at market)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(food, be at market)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(tuna, be at market)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(food, be at farmer market)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(tuna, be at market)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(tuna, be at market)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(food, be at market)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(tuna, be at market)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(fish, be at market)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(tuna, be at market)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(food, be buy at market)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(tuna, be at market)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(food, be at farmer market)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(tuna, be at market)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(fish, be at market)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(tuna, be at market)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(food, be at market)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(tuna, be at market)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(food, be buy at market)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(tuna, be at market)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(food, be at farmer market)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(fish, be at market)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(tuna, be at market)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(tuna, be at market)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(food, be at market)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(tuna, be at market)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(tuna, be at market)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(food, be buy at market)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(tuna, be at market)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(tuna, be at market)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(food, be at farmer market)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(tuna, be at market)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(tuna, be at market)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(tuna, be at market)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(tuna, be at market)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(tuna, be at market)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(tuna, be at market)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(tuna, be at market)

Typical implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(tuna, be at market)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(tuna, be at market)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(tuna, be at market)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(food, be at market)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(tuna, be at market)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(fish, be at market)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(tuna, be at market)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(food, be buy at market)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(tuna, be at market)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(food, be at farmer market)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(tuna, be at market)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(food, be at market)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(tuna, be at market)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(food, be buy at market)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(tuna, be at market)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(fish, be at market)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(tuna, be at market)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(food, be at farmer market)