tuna: be different from other fish

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fish
Weight: 0.68
, food
Weight: 0.65
, species
Weight: 0.63
, dish
Weight: 0.62
, staple
Weight: 0.59
Siblings halibut
Weight: 0.38
, atlantic salmon
Weight: 0.38
, mackerel
Weight: 0.37
, rainbow trout
Weight: 0.37
, marlin
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be different from other fish 1.00
be different from fish 0.98
is fish 0.88
taste like fish 0.85
be called tuna fish 0.83
is canned fish 0.80
be more expensive than salmon 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(tuna, be different from other fish)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(halibut, be more expensive than salmon)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(tuna, be different from other fish)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(marlin, is fish)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(tuna, be different from other fish)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(marlin, is fish)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(marlin, is fish)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(tuna, be different from other fish)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(halibut, be more expensive than salmon)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(halibut, be more expensive than salmon)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(tuna, be different from other fish)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(tuna, be different from other fish)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(tuna, be different from other fish)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(tuna, be different from fish)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(tuna, be different from other fish)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(tuna, is fish)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(tuna, be different from other fish)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(tuna, be different from fish)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(tuna, be different from other fish)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(tuna, is fish)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(tuna, be different from other fish)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(tuna, is fish)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(tuna, be different from other fish)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(tuna, be different from fish)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(tuna, be different from other fish)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(tuna, is fish)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(tuna, be different from other fish)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(tuna, is canned fish)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(tuna, be different from other fish)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tuna, taste like fish)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(tuna, be different from other fish)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(tuna, is canned fish)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(tuna, be different from other fish)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(tuna, be more expensive than salmon)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(tuna, be different from other fish)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(tuna, is canned fish)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(tuna, be different from other fish)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(tuna, be different from fish)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(tuna, be different from other fish)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(tuna, be more expensive than salmon)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(tuna, be different from other fish)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(tuna, be more expensive than salmon)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(tuna, be different from other fish)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(tuna, be called tuna fish)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(tuna, be different from other fish)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(tuna, be called tuna fish)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(tuna, be different from other fish)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(tuna, is canned fish)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(tuna, be different from other fish)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(tuna, taste like fish)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(tuna, be different from other fish)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(tuna, be called tuna fish)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(tuna, be different from other fish)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(tuna, be called tuna fish)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(tuna, be different from other fish)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(tuna, be more expensive than salmon)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(tuna, be different from other fish)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(tuna, taste like fish)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(tuna, be different from other fish)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tuna, taste like fish)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(tuna, be different from other fish)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(tuna, be different from other fish)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(tuna, be different from other fish)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(tuna, be different from other fish)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(tuna, be different from other fish)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(tuna, be different from other fish)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(marlin, is fish)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(tuna, be different from other fish)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(halibut, be more expensive than salmon)