tundra: have permafrost

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents biome
Weight: 0.62
, habitat
Weight: 0.54
, landscape
Weight: 0.49
, vehicle
Weight: 0.48
, ecosystem
Weight: 0.48
Siblings grassland
Weight: 0.33
, coral reef
Weight: 0.33
, marsh
Weight: 0.32
, wetland
Weight: 0.32
, moss
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
have permafrost 1.00
be different from polar tundra 0.81
be different from tundra 0.77
be different from alpine tundra 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(tundra, have permafrost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(tundra, have permafrost)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(tundra, have permafrost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(tundra, be different from polar tundra)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(tundra, have permafrost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(tundra, be different from tundra)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(tundra, have permafrost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(tundra, be different from alpine tundra)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(tundra, have permafrost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(tundra, be different from polar tundra)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(tundra, have permafrost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(tundra, be different from tundra)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(tundra, have permafrost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(tundra, be different from alpine tundra)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(tundra, have permafrost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(tundra, be different from tundra)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(tundra, have permafrost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(tundra, be different from polar tundra)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(tundra, have permafrost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(tundra, be different from alpine tundra)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(tundra, have permafrost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(tundra, be different from tundra)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(tundra, have permafrost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(tundra, be different from polar tundra)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(tundra, have permafrost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(tundra, be different from alpine tundra)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(tundra, have permafrost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(tundra, have permafrost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(tundra, have permafrost)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(tundra, have permafrost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(tundra, have permafrost)