tundra: is ecosystem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents biome
Weight: 0.62
, habitat
Weight: 0.54
, landscape
Weight: 0.49
, vehicle
Weight: 0.48
, ecosystem
Weight: 0.48
Siblings grassland
Weight: 0.33
, coral reef
Weight: 0.33
, marsh
Weight: 0.32
, wetland
Weight: 0.32
, moss
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is ecosystem 1.00
is unique ecosystem 0.94
is habitat 0.78
have biodiversity 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(tundra, is ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(grassland, is ecosystem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(tundra, is ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(grassland, is ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(grassland, is ecosystem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(tundra, is ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(tundra, is ecosystem)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(tundra, is ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tundra, is unique ecosystem)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(tundra, is ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(tundra, is habitat)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(tundra, is ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(tundra, have biodiversity)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(tundra, is ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(tundra, have biodiversity)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(tundra, is ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(tundra, is habitat)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(tundra, is ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(tundra, have biodiversity)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(tundra, is ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(tundra, is habitat)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(tundra, is ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(tundra, have biodiversity)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(tundra, is ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(tundra, is habitat)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(tundra, is ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(tundra, is unique ecosystem)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(tundra, is ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(tundra, is unique ecosystem)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(tundra, is ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(tundra, is unique ecosystem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(tundra, is ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(tundra, is ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(tundra, is ecosystem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(tundra, is ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(tundra, is ecosystem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(tundra, is ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(grassland, is ecosystem)