tundra: is unique ecosystem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents biome
Weight: 0.62
, habitat
Weight: 0.54
, landscape
Weight: 0.49
, vehicle
Weight: 0.48
, ecosystem
Weight: 0.48
Siblings grassland
Weight: 0.33
, coral reef
Weight: 0.33
, marsh
Weight: 0.32
, wetland
Weight: 0.32
, moss
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is unique ecosystem 1.00
is ecosystem 0.94
is unique 0.82
be dynamic in nature 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(biome, is unique)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(tundra, is unique ecosystem)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(ecosystem, be dynamic in nature)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(tundra, is unique ecosystem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(tundra, is unique ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(biome, is unique)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(tundra, is unique ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(ecosystem, be dynamic in nature)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tundra, is unique ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(biome, is unique)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tundra, is unique ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, be dynamic in nature)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tundra, is unique ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(grassland, is unique)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tundra, is unique ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(wetland, is unique)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tundra, is unique ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(grassland, is ecosystem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(biome, is unique)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(tundra, is unique ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(tundra, is unique ecosystem)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(ecosystem, be dynamic in nature)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(tundra, is unique ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(tundra, is unique ecosystem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(tundra, is unique ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(grassland, is ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(grassland, is ecosystem)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(tundra, is unique ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(wetland, is unique)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(wetland, is unique)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(tundra, is unique ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(grassland, is unique)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(grassland, is unique)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(tundra, is unique ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(tundra, is unique ecosystem)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(tundra, is unique ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(tundra, is ecosystem)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(tundra, is unique ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(tundra, is ecosystem)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(tundra, is unique ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(tundra, is ecosystem)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(tundra, is unique ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(tundra, is unique)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(tundra, is unique ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(tundra, is ecosystem)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(tundra, is unique ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(tundra, is unique)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(tundra, is unique ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(tundra, is unique)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(tundra, is unique ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(tundra, is unique)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(tundra, is unique ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(tundra, is unique ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tundra, is unique ecosystem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(tundra, is unique ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(tundra, is unique ecosystem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tundra, is unique ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(ecosystem, be dynamic in nature)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tundra, is unique ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(biome, is unique)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tundra, is unique ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(grassland, is ecosystem)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tundra, is unique ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(wetland, is unique)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tundra, is unique ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(grassland, is unique)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(tundra, is unique ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(biome, is unique)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(tundra, is unique ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(ecosystem, be dynamic in nature)