tuning fork: has quality questions

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents instrument
Weight: 0.61
, musical instrument
Weight: 0.60
, object
Weight: 0.59
, sound
Weight: 0.56
Siblings brass instrument
Weight: 0.33
, percussion instrument
Weight: 0.33
, stringed instrument
Weight: 0.33
, negotiable instrument
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality questions 1.00
has quality good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(musical instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(tuning fork, has quality questions)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(tuning fork, has quality questions)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(tuning fork, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(instrument, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(tuning fork, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(musical instrument, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(tuning fork, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(instrument, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(tuning fork, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(musical instrument, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(tuning fork, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(negotiable instrument, has quality questions)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(tuning fork, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(negotiable instrument, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(musical instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(tuning fork, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(tuning fork, has quality questions)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(tuning fork, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(tuning fork, has quality questions)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(tuning fork, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(negotiable instrument, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(negotiable instrument, has quality questions)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(tuning fork, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(negotiable instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(negotiable instrument, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(tuning fork, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(tuning fork, has quality questions)

Similarity expansion

0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(tuning fork, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(tuning fork, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(tuning fork, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(tuning fork, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(tuning fork, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(tuning fork, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(tuning fork, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tuning fork, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(tuning fork, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(tuning fork, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(tuning fork, has quality questions)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(tuning fork, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(tuning fork, has quality questions)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(tuning fork, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(musical instrument, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(tuning fork, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(instrument, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(tuning fork, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(negotiable instrument, has quality questions)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(tuning fork, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(negotiable instrument, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(tuning fork, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(musical instrument, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(tuning fork, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(instrument, has quality good)