tunnel: be built under large bodies of water

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents project
Weight: 0.67
, route
Weight: 0.64
, structure
Weight: 0.63
, facility
Weight: 0.61
Siblings underground
Weight: 0.55
, bridge
Weight: 0.35
, rail
Weight: 0.34
, stadium
Weight: 0.34
, construction site
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be built under large bodies of water 1.00
be built under large bodies 0.98
be built under bodies of water 0.97
be built under bodies 0.95
be built in water 0.86
be built over water 0.85
be over water built 0.85
be built in deep water 0.83
be built under rivers 0.83
be constructed in water 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(structure, be constructed in water)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(tunnel, be built under large bodies of water)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(tunnel, be built under large bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(structure, be constructed in water)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(tunnel, be built under large bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(structure, be constructed in water)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(tunnel, be built under large bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(bridge, be built in water)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(tunnel, be built under large bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(bridge, be built over water)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(structure, be constructed in water)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(tunnel, be built under large bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(tunnel, be built under large bodies of water)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(tunnel, be built under large bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(bridge, be built in water)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(bridge, be built in water)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(tunnel, be built under large bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(bridge, be built over water)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(bridge, be built over water)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(tunnel, be built under large bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(tunnel, be built under large bodies of water)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(tunnel, be built under large bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(tunnel, be built under bodies)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(tunnel, be built under large bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(tunnel, be built under bodies)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(tunnel, be built under large bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(tunnel, be built under bodies of water)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(tunnel, be built under large bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(tunnel, be built under bodies of water)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(tunnel, be built under large bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(tunnel, be built under bodies of water)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(tunnel, be built under large bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(tunnel, be built under large bodies)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(tunnel, be built under large bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(tunnel, be built under bodies)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(tunnel, be built under large bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(tunnel, be built under large bodies)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(tunnel, be built under large bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(tunnel, be built under large bodies)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(tunnel, be built under large bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(tunnel, be built under bodies)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(tunnel, be built under large bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(tunnel, be built under rivers)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(tunnel, be built under large bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(tunnel, be built under bodies of water)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(tunnel, be built under large bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(tunnel, be built under rivers)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(tunnel, be built under large bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(tunnel, be built under rivers)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(tunnel, be built under large bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(tunnel, be built under large bodies)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(tunnel, be built under large bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(tunnel, be built under rivers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(tunnel, be built under large bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(tunnel, be built under large bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(tunnel, be built under large bodies of water)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(tunnel, be built under large bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(tunnel, be built under large bodies of water)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(tunnel, be built under large bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(structure, be constructed in water)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(tunnel, be built under large bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(bridge, be built in water)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(tunnel, be built under large bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(bridge, be built over water)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(tunnel, be built under large bodies of water)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(structure, be constructed in water)