tunnel: be for cars

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents project
Weight: 0.67
, route
Weight: 0.64
, structure
Weight: 0.63
, facility
Weight: 0.61
Siblings underground
Weight: 0.55
, bridge
Weight: 0.35
, rail
Weight: 0.34
, stadium
Weight: 0.34
, construction site
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be for cars 1.00
be cars 0.99
support cars 0.89
be closed to cars 0.86
carry cars falling 0.81
be more efficient than truck 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(project, be cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(tunnel, be for cars)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(tunnel, be for cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(project, be cars)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(tunnel, be for cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(project, be cars)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(tunnel, be for cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(bridge, carry cars falling)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(tunnel, be for cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(rail, be more efficient than truck)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(project, be cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(tunnel, be for cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(tunnel, be for cars)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(tunnel, be for cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(bridge, carry cars falling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(bridge, carry cars falling)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(tunnel, be for cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(rail, be more efficient than truck) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(rail, be more efficient than truck)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(tunnel, be for cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(tunnel, be for cars)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(tunnel, be for cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(tunnel, be for cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(tunnel, be for cars)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(tunnel, be for cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(tunnel, be for cars)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(tunnel, be for cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(project, be cars)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(tunnel, be for cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(bridge, carry cars falling)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(tunnel, be for cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(rail, be more efficient than truck)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(tunnel, be for cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(project, be cars)