tunnel: be important to railroads

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents project
Weight: 0.67
, route
Weight: 0.64
, structure
Weight: 0.63
, facility
Weight: 0.61
Siblings underground
Weight: 0.55
, bridge
Weight: 0.35
, rail
Weight: 0.34
, stadium
Weight: 0.34
, construction site
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to railroads 1.00
were important to railroads 0.99
were important railroads 0.99
were railroads 0.97
were important to rail roads 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(tunnel, be important to railroads)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(bridge, were important railroads)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(tunnel, be important to railroads)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(bridge, be important to railroads)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(tunnel, be important to railroads)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(bridge, were important to railroads)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(tunnel, be important to railroads)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(bridge, were important to rail roads)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(tunnel, be important to railroads)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(bridge, be important to railroads)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(bridge, be important to railroads)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(tunnel, be important to railroads)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(bridge, were important to railroads)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(bridge, were important to railroads)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(tunnel, be important to railroads)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(bridge, were important railroads)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(bridge, were important railroads)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(tunnel, be important to railroads)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(bridge, were important to rail roads)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(bridge, were important to rail roads)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(tunnel, be important to railroads)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(tunnel, be important to railroads)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(tunnel, be important to railroads)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(tunnel, were important to railroads)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(tunnel, be important to railroads)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tunnel, were important to railroads)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(tunnel, be important to railroads)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(tunnel, were important to railroads)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(tunnel, be important to railroads)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(tunnel, were important to rail roads)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(tunnel, be important to railroads)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(tunnel, were important to railroads)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(tunnel, be important to railroads)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(tunnel, were important to rail roads)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(tunnel, be important to railroads)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(tunnel, were important to rail roads)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(tunnel, be important to railroads)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(tunnel, were important to rail roads)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(tunnel, be important to railroads)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(tunnel, be important to railroads)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(tunnel, be important to railroads)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(tunnel, be important to railroads)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(tunnel, be important to railroads)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(tunnel, be important to railroads)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(bridge, were important to railroads)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(tunnel, be important to railroads)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(bridge, be important to railroads)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(tunnel, be important to railroads)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(bridge, were important railroads)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(tunnel, be important to railroads)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(bridge, were important to rail roads)