turf: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents grass
Weight: 0.60
, surface
Weight: 0.59
, factor
Weight: 0.52
, landscaping
Weight: 0.50
, place
Weight: 0.47
Siblings artificial turf
Weight: 0.37
, asphalt
Weight: 0.33
, bermuda
Weight: 0.32
, ground
Weight: 0.32
, hardwood
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
hurt bad 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(turf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(artificial turf, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(turf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(artificial turf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(artificial turf, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(turf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(turf, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(turf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(turf, hurt bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(turf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(turf, hurt bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(turf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(turf, hurt bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(turf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(turf, hurt bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(turf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(turf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(turf, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(turf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(turf, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(turf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(artificial turf, has quality bad)