turf: hurt bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents grass
Weight: 0.60
, surface
Weight: 0.59
, factor
Weight: 0.52
, landscaping
Weight: 0.50
, place
Weight: 0.47
Siblings artificial turf
Weight: 0.37
, asphalt
Weight: 0.33
, bermuda
Weight: 0.32
, ground
Weight: 0.32
, hardwood
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
hurt bad 1.00
hurt 0.95
burn hurt 0.85
has quality bad 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(turf, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(artificial turf, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(turf, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(artificial turf, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(artificial turf, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(turf, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(turf, hurt bad)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(turf, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(turf, hurt)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(turf, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(turf, hurt)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(turf, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(turf, hurt)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(turf, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(turf, burn hurt)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(turf, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(turf, burn hurt)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(turf, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(turf, burn hurt)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(turf, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(turf, hurt)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(turf, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(turf, burn hurt)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(turf, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(turf, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(turf, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(turf, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(turf, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(turf, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(turf, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(turf, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(turf, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(turf, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(turf, hurt bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(turf, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(turf, hurt bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(turf, hurt bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(artificial turf, has quality bad)