turf: is hot

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents grass
Weight: 0.60
, surface
Weight: 0.59
, factor
Weight: 0.52
, landscaping
Weight: 0.50
, place
Weight: 0.47
Siblings artificial turf
Weight: 0.37
, asphalt
Weight: 0.33
, bermuda
Weight: 0.32
, ground
Weight: 0.32
, hardwood
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is hot 1.00
get hot 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(turf, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(asphalt, get hot)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(turf, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(asphalt, is hot)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(turf, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(artificial turf, get hot)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(turf, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(asphalt, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(asphalt, is hot)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(turf, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(artificial turf, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(artificial turf, get hot)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(turf, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(asphalt, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(asphalt, get hot)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(turf, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(turf, is hot)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(turf, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(turf, get hot)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(turf, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(turf, get hot)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(turf, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(turf, get hot)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(turf, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(turf, get hot)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(turf, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(turf, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(turf, is hot)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(turf, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(turf, is hot)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(turf, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(artificial turf, get hot)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(turf, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(asphalt, get hot)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(turf, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(asphalt, is hot)