twin: be more common in ivf

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents baby
Weight: 0.57
, sibling
Weight: 0.51
, factor
Weight: 0.49
, girl
Weight: 0.49
Siblings baby oil
Weight: 0.32
, sister
Weight: 0.31
, daughter
Weight: 0.30
, niece
Weight: 0.30
, pregnancy
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more common in ivf 1.00
be common in ivf 0.98
is more common 0.91
become more common 0.88
be more common in mothers 0.87
be more likely with ivf 0.87
is common 0.86
be more common in older mothers 0.85
become common 0.84
be more common in africa 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(twin, be more common in ivf)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(twin, be more common in ivf)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(twin, be more common in ivf)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(twin, is common)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(twin, be more common in ivf)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(twin, is more common)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(twin, be more common in ivf)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(twin, be common in ivf)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(twin, be more common in ivf)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(twin, be more common in africa)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(twin, be more common in ivf)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(twin, is more common)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(twin, be more common in ivf)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(twin, be common in ivf)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(twin, be more common in ivf)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(twin, be more common in africa)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(twin, be more common in ivf)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(twin, is common)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(twin, be more common in ivf)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(twin, be more common in africa)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(twin, be more common in ivf)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(twin, become more common)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(twin, be more common in ivf)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(twin, be common in ivf)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(twin, be more common in ivf)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(twin, become more common)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(twin, be more common in ivf)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(twin, be more common in africa)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(twin, be more common in ivf)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(twin, become more common)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(twin, be more common in ivf)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(twin, is more common)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(twin, be more common in ivf)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(twin, become more common)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(twin, be more common in ivf)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(twin, is common)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(twin, be more common in ivf)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(twin, be common in ivf)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(twin, be more common in ivf)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(twin, is more common)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(twin, be more common in ivf)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(twin, is common)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(twin, be more common in ivf)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(twin, be more common in ivf)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(twin, be more common in ivf)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(twin, be more common in ivf)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(twin, be more common in ivf)