twinkies: taste good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents junk food
Weight: 0.66
, product
Weight: 0.58
, dessert
Weight: 0.57
, food
Weight: 0.56
, staple
Weight: 0.54
Siblings soda pop
Weight: 0.35
, fast food
Weight: 0.34
, chocolate cake
Weight: 0.34
, cheese
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste good 1.00
is tasty 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(dessert, taste good)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(twinkies, taste good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(food, is tasty)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(twinkies, taste good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(junk food, is tasty)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(twinkies, taste good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(twinkies, taste good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(dessert, taste good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(twinkies, taste good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(junk food, is tasty)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(twinkies, taste good)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(food, is tasty)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(twinkies, taste good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(dessert, taste good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(twinkies, taste good)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is tasty)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(twinkies, taste good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(food, is tasty)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(twinkies, taste good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is tasty)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(twinkies, taste good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(cheese, is tasty)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(dessert, taste good)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(twinkies, taste good)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(twinkies, taste good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(food, is tasty)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(twinkies, taste good)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(twinkies, taste good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(junk food, is tasty)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(twinkies, taste good)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(twinkies, taste good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(twinkies, taste good)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(cheese, is tasty)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(cheese, is tasty)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(twinkies, taste good)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(fast food, is tasty)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(fast food, is tasty)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(twinkies, taste good)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(twinkies, taste good)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(twinkies, taste good)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(twinkies, is tasty)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(twinkies, taste good)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(twinkies, is tasty)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(twinkies, taste good)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(twinkies, is tasty)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(twinkies, taste good)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(twinkies, is tasty)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(twinkies, taste good)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(twinkies, taste good)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(twinkies, taste good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(twinkies, taste good)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(twinkies, taste good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(twinkies, taste good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(dessert, taste good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(twinkies, taste good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(junk food, is tasty)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(twinkies, taste good)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is tasty)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(twinkies, taste good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(fast food, is tasty)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(twinkies, taste good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(cheese, is tasty)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(twinkies, taste good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(dessert, taste good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(twinkies, taste good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(junk food, is tasty)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(twinkies, taste good)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is tasty)