twitter: be good for business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents web site
Weight: 0.72
, web page
Weight: 0.64
, forum
Weight: 0.64
, website
Weight: 0.63
, topic
Weight: 0.63
Siblings blog
Weight: 0.37
, web
Weight: 0.37
, wikipedia
Weight: 0.36
, web browser
Weight: 0.35
, google
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for business 1.00
be important for business 0.94
be useful for business 0.89
be used in business environment 0.84
be good for marketing 0.82
has quality good 0.80
be good for advertising 0.78
has quality bad 0.76
be important for marketing 0.76
be better 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(website, be important for business)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(twitter, be good for business)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(website, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(twitter, be good for business)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(forum, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(twitter, be good for business)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(forum, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(twitter, be good for business)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(website, be good for business)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(website, be important for business)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(forum, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(forum, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(forum, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(website, be important for business)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(website, be good for business)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(forum, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(web browser, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(wikipedia, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(web, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(blog, be important for business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(google, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(blog, be good for business)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(blog, be good for marketing)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(blog, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(google, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(wikipedia, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(web, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(website, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(twitter, be good for business)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(website, be important for business)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(twitter, be good for business)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(forum, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(twitter, be good for business)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(forum, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(twitter, be good for business)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(blog, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(blog, be good for business)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(blog, be important for business)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(blog, be important for business)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(blog, be good for marketing)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(blog, be good for marketing)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(web, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(web, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(wikipedia, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(wikipedia, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(blog, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(blog, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(google, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(google, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(web, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(web, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(google, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(google, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(wikipedia, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(wikipedia, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(web browser, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(web browser, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(twitter, be good for business)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(twitter, be important for business)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(twitter, be important for business)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(twitter, be important for business)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(twitter, be used in business environment)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(twitter, be used in business environment)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(twitter, be good for marketing)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(twitter, be used in business environment)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(twitter, be good for marketing)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(twitter, has quality good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be important for business)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(twitter, be good for marketing)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(twitter, has quality bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(twitter, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(twitter, be important for marketing)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(twitter, be better)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(twitter, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(twitter, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(twitter, be better)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(twitter, be important for marketing)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(twitter, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(twitter, be better)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be used in business environment)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(twitter, be important for marketing)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(twitter, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be good for marketing)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(twitter, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be important for marketing)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be good for business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(twitter, be good for business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(website, be good for business)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(website, be important for business)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(forum, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(forum, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(blog, be good for business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(blog, be good for marketing)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(web, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(web, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(blog, be important for business)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(blog, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(wikipedia, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(wikipedia, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(web browser, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(google, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(google, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(website, be good for business)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(website, be important for business)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(forum, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(twitter, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(forum, has quality bad)