twitter: be used in business environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents web site
Weight: 0.72
, web page
Weight: 0.64
, forum
Weight: 0.64
, website
Weight: 0.63
, topic
Weight: 0.63
Siblings blog
Weight: 0.37
, web
Weight: 0.37
, wikipedia
Weight: 0.36
, web browser
Weight: 0.35
, google
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used in business environment 1.00
be important for business 0.86
be good for business 0.84
be useful for business 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(website, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(twitter, be used in business environment)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(website, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(twitter, be used in business environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(twitter, be used in business environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(website, be good for business)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(twitter, be used in business environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(website, be important for business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be used in business environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(website, be important for business)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be used in business environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(website, be good for business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be used in business environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(blog, be important for business)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be used in business environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(blog, be good for business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(website, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(twitter, be used in business environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(twitter, be used in business environment)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(website, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(twitter, be used in business environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(twitter, be used in business environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(twitter, be used in business environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(blog, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(blog, be good for business)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(twitter, be used in business environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(blog, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(blog, be important for business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(twitter, be used in business environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(twitter, be used in business environment)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(twitter, be used in business environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be important for business)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(twitter, be used in business environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be good for business)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(twitter, be used in business environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(twitter, be good for business)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(twitter, be used in business environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(twitter, be important for business)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(twitter, be used in business environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(twitter, be good for business)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(twitter, be used in business environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(twitter, be good for business)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(twitter, be used in business environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(twitter, be important for business)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(twitter, be used in business environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(twitter, be important for business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(twitter, be used in business environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(twitter, be used in business environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be used in business environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(twitter, be used in business environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(twitter, be used in business environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be used in business environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(website, be good for business)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be used in business environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(website, be important for business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be used in business environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(blog, be good for business)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be used in business environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(blog, be important for business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(twitter, be used in business environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(website, be good for business)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(twitter, be used in business environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(website, be important for business)