twitter: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents web site
Weight: 0.72
, web page
Weight: 0.64
, forum
Weight: 0.64
, website
Weight: 0.63
, topic
Weight: 0.63
Siblings blog
Weight: 0.37
, web
Weight: 0.37
, wikipedia
Weight: 0.36
, web browser
Weight: 0.35
, google
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
be good for business 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(twitter, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(forum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(twitter, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(website, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(twitter, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(twitter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(forum, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(twitter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(forum, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(twitter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(website, be good for business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(twitter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(forum, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(twitter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(forum, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(twitter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(website, be good for business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(twitter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(web browser, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(twitter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(wikipedia, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(twitter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(web, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(twitter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(google, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(twitter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(blog, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(twitter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(google, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(twitter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(wikipedia, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(twitter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(web, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(twitter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(blog, be good for business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(twitter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(twitter, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(forum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(twitter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(twitter, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(website, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(twitter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(twitter, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(twitter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(web, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(web, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(twitter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(web, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(web, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(twitter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(wikipedia, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(wikipedia, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(twitter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(blog, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(blog, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(twitter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(google, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(google, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(twitter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(google, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(google, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(twitter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(wikipedia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(wikipedia, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(twitter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(web browser, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(web browser, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(twitter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(blog, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(blog, be good for business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(twitter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(twitter, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(twitter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(twitter, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(twitter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(twitter, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(twitter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(twitter, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(twitter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(twitter, be good for business)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(twitter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(twitter, be good for business)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(twitter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(twitter, be good for business)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(twitter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(twitter, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(twitter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(twitter, be good for business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(twitter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(twitter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(twitter, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(twitter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(twitter, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(twitter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(forum, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(twitter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(forum, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(twitter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(website, be good for business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(twitter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(web, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(twitter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(web, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(twitter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(blog, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(twitter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(wikipedia, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(twitter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(wikipedia, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(twitter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(web browser, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(twitter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(google, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(twitter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(google, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(twitter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(blog, be good for business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(twitter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(forum, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(twitter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(forum, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(twitter, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(website, be good for business)