two way to go: be at fork in road

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at fork in road 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(two way to go, be at fork in road)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(two way to go, be at fork in road)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(two way to go, be at fork in road)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(two way to go, be at fork in road)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(two way to go, be at fork in road)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(two way to go, be at fork in road)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(two way to go, be at fork in road)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(two way to go, be at fork in road)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(two way to go, be at fork in road)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(two way to go, be at fork in road)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(two way to go, be at fork in road)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(two way to go, be at fork in road)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(two way to go, be at fork in road)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(two way to go, be at fork in road)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(two way to go, be at fork in road)