two: compare with early versions of names

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.57
, size
Weight: 0.53
, man
Weight: 0.52
, tool
Weight: 0.51
Siblings both
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
compare with early versions of names 1.00
compare with versions of names 0.98
compare with early versions 0.96
compare with early versions of scientific names 0.95
compare with versions 0.94
compare with versions of scientific names 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(two, compare with early versions of names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(two, compare with early versions of names)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(two, compare with early versions of names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(two, compare with early versions of scientific names)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(two, compare with early versions of names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(two, compare with early versions of scientific names)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(two, compare with early versions of names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(two, compare with versions of names)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(two, compare with early versions of names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(two, compare with versions of scientific names)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(two, compare with early versions of names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(two, compare with early versions of scientific names)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(two, compare with early versions of names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(two, compare with early versions of scientific names)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(two, compare with early versions of names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(two, compare with versions of names)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(two, compare with early versions of names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(two, compare with versions of scientific names)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(two, compare with early versions of names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(two, compare with versions of scientific names)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(two, compare with early versions of names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(two, compare with versions of scientific names)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(two, compare with early versions of names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(two, compare with versions of names)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(two, compare with early versions of names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(two, compare with versions of names)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(two, compare with early versions of names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(two, compare with early versions of names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(two, compare with early versions of names)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(two, compare with early versions of names) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(two, compare with early versions of names)