uber: be banned in new york

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.58
, app
Weight: 0.57
, company
Weight: 0.55
, brand
Weight: 0.54
, service
Weight: 0.52
Siblings oh
Weight: 0.33
, hey
Weight: 0.33
, geek
Weight: 0.32
, nerd
Weight: 0.32
, chick
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be banned in new york 1.00
be banned in york 0.99
be illegal in new york 0.93
be illegal in york 0.91
be banned in london 0.86
be banned from london 0.86
be banned in spain 0.85
be banned from california 0.83
be banned in germany 0.83
be banned in vancouver 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(uber, be banned in new york)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(uber, be banned in new york)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(uber, be banned in new york)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(uber, be banned in london)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(uber, be banned in new york)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(uber, be banned in london)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(uber, be banned in new york)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(uber, be banned in london)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(uber, be banned in new york)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(uber, be banned in london)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(uber, be banned in new york)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(uber, be banned in germany)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(uber, be banned in new york)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(uber, be banned in germany)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(uber, be banned in new york)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(uber, be banned in vancouver)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(uber, be banned in new york)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(uber, be banned in vancouver)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(uber, be banned in new york)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(uber, be banned in germany)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(uber, be banned in new york)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(uber, be banned in germany)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(uber, be banned in new york)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(uber, be banned in vancouver)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(uber, be banned in new york)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(uber, be banned in vancouver)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(uber, be banned in new york)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(uber, be banned in new york)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(uber, be banned in new york)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(uber, be banned in new york)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(uber, be banned in new york)