uber: be banned in vancouver

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.58
, app
Weight: 0.57
, company
Weight: 0.55
, brand
Weight: 0.54
, service
Weight: 0.52
Siblings oh
Weight: 0.33
, hey
Weight: 0.33
, geek
Weight: 0.32
, nerd
Weight: 0.32
, chick
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be banned in vancouver 1.00
be banned again in vancouver 0.98
be banned in london 0.86
be banned from london 0.86
be banned in japan 0.84
be banned in germany 0.84
be banned in york 0.84
be banned in spain 0.83
be banned from california 0.82
is banned 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(uber, be banned in vancouver)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(chick, is banned)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(uber, be banned in vancouver)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(chick, is banned)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(chick, is banned)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(uber, be banned in vancouver)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(uber, be banned in vancouver)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(uber, be banned in vancouver)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(uber, be banned in london)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(uber, be banned in vancouver)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(uber, be banned in germany)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(uber, be banned in vancouver)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(uber, be banned in japan)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(uber, be banned in vancouver)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(uber, is banned)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(uber, be banned in vancouver)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(uber, be banned in london)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(uber, be banned in vancouver)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(uber, be banned in london)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(uber, be banned in vancouver)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(uber, is banned)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(uber, be banned in vancouver)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(uber, be banned in japan)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(uber, be banned in vancouver)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(uber, be banned in germany)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(uber, be banned in vancouver)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(uber, be banned in germany)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(uber, be banned in vancouver)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(uber, be banned in japan)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(uber, be banned in vancouver)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(uber, is banned)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(uber, be banned in vancouver)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(uber, be banned in london)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(uber, be banned in vancouver)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(uber, be banned in japan)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(uber, be banned in vancouver)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(uber, be banned in germany)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(uber, be banned in vancouver)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(uber, is banned)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(uber, be banned in vancouver)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(uber, be banned in vancouver)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(uber, be banned in vancouver)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(uber, be banned in vancouver)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(uber, be banned in vancouver)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(uber, be banned in vancouver)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(chick, is banned)