uber: be in chicago

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.58
, app
Weight: 0.57
, company
Weight: 0.55
, brand
Weight: 0.54
, service
Weight: 0.52
Siblings oh
Weight: 0.33
, hey
Weight: 0.33
, geek
Weight: 0.32
, nerd
Weight: 0.32
, chick
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in chicago 1.00
be in seattle prius 0.81
is london 0.78
work in london 0.78
run in london 0.78
be legal in nyc 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(uber, be in chicago)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(uber, be in chicago)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(uber, be in chicago)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(uber, run in london)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(uber, be in chicago)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(uber, work in london)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(uber, be in chicago)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(uber, be legal in nyc)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(uber, be in chicago)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(uber, be in seattle prius)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(uber, be in chicago)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(uber, run in london)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(uber, be in chicago)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(uber, be in seattle prius)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(uber, be in chicago)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(uber, be legal in nyc)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(uber, be in chicago)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(uber, be in seattle prius)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(uber, be in chicago)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(uber, run in london)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(uber, be in chicago)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(uber, work in london)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(uber, be in chicago)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(uber, be in seattle prius)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(uber, be in chicago)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(uber, be legal in nyc)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(uber, be in chicago)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(uber, work in london)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(uber, be in chicago)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(uber, run in london)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(uber, be in chicago)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(uber, be legal in nyc)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(uber, be in chicago)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(uber, work in london)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(uber, be in chicago)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(uber, be in chicago)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(uber, be in chicago)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(uber, be in chicago)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(uber, be in chicago)