uber: be more successful than lyft

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.58
, app
Weight: 0.57
, company
Weight: 0.55
, brand
Weight: 0.54
, service
Weight: 0.52
Siblings oh
Weight: 0.33
, hey
Weight: 0.33
, geek
Weight: 0.32
, nerd
Weight: 0.32
, chick
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more successful than lyft 1.00
be more expensive than lyft 0.87
be than lyft 0.86
be better than lyft 0.84
is more expensive 0.83
is more expensive now 0.83
get more expensive 0.83
be more expensive at night 0.78
be cheaper than lyft 0.77
be more expensive in cities 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(thing, get more expensive)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(uber, be more successful than lyft)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(uber, be more successful than lyft)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(thing, get more expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(uber, be more successful than lyft)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(thing, get more expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(thing, get more expensive)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(uber, be more successful than lyft)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(uber, be more successful than lyft)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(uber, be more successful than lyft)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(uber, be more successful than lyft)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(uber, be more successful than lyft)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(uber, be than lyft)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(uber, be more successful than lyft)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(uber, be than lyft)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(uber, be more successful than lyft)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(uber, be than lyft)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(uber, be more successful than lyft)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(uber, be more expensive than lyft)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(uber, be more successful than lyft)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(uber, be more expensive than lyft)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(uber, be more successful than lyft)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(uber, be better than lyft)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(uber, be more successful than lyft)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(uber, be more expensive than lyft)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(uber, be more successful than lyft)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(uber, be more expensive in cities)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(uber, be more successful than lyft)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(uber, be more expensive at night)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(uber, be more successful than lyft)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(uber, be more expensive in cities)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(uber, be more successful than lyft)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(uber, be more expensive at night)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(uber, be more successful than lyft)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(uber, is more expensive now)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(uber, be more successful than lyft)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(uber, be more expensive in cities)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(uber, be more successful than lyft)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(uber, be more expensive than lyft)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(uber, be more successful than lyft)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(uber, be more expensive at night)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(uber, be more successful than lyft)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(uber, is more expensive now)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(uber, be more successful than lyft)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(uber, is more expensive now)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(uber, be more successful than lyft)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(uber, is more expensive now)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(uber, be more successful than lyft)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(uber, be better than lyft)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(uber, be more successful than lyft)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(uber, be more expensive in cities)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(uber, be more successful than lyft)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(uber, be more expensive at night)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(uber, be more successful than lyft)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(uber, be better than lyft)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(uber, be more successful than lyft)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(uber, is more expensive)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(uber, be more successful than lyft)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(uber, get more expensive)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(uber, be more successful than lyft)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(uber, be cheaper than lyft)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(uber, be more successful than lyft)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(uber, be cheaper than lyft)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(uber, be more successful than lyft)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(uber, be cheaper than lyft)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(uber, be more successful than lyft)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(uber, get more expensive)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(uber, be more successful than lyft)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(uber, get more expensive)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(uber, be more successful than lyft)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(uber, is more expensive)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(uber, be more successful than lyft)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(uber, be cheaper than lyft)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(uber, be more successful than lyft)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(uber, is more expensive)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(uber, be more successful than lyft)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(uber, get more expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(uber, be more successful than lyft)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(uber, be than lyft)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(uber, be more successful than lyft)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(uber, is more expensive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(uber, be more successful than lyft)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(uber, be better than lyft)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(uber, be more successful than lyft)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(uber, be more successful than lyft)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(uber, be more successful than lyft)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(uber, be more successful than lyft)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(uber, be more successful than lyft)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(uber, be more successful than lyft)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, get more expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(uber, be more successful than lyft)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, get more expensive)