uber: is bad company

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.58
, app
Weight: 0.57
, company
Weight: 0.55
, brand
Weight: 0.54
, service
Weight: 0.52
Siblings oh
Weight: 0.33
, hey
Weight: 0.33
, geek
Weight: 0.32
, nerd
Weight: 0.32
, chick
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is bad company 1.00
has quality bad 0.79
be in business 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(company, be in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(uber, is bad company)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(uber, is bad company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(company, be in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(uber, is bad company) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(company, be in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(uber, is bad company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(oh, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(uber, is bad company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(chick, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(uber, is bad company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(nerd, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(company, be in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(uber, is bad company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(uber, is bad company)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(uber, is bad company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(chick, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(chick, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(uber, is bad company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(nerd, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(nerd, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(uber, is bad company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(oh, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(oh, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(uber, is bad company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(uber, is bad company)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(uber, is bad company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(uber, be in business)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(uber, is bad company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(uber, be in business)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(uber, is bad company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(uber, be in business)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(uber, is bad company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(uber, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(uber, is bad company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(uber, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(uber, is bad company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(uber, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(uber, is bad company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(uber, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(uber, is bad company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(uber, be in business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(uber, is bad company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(uber, is bad company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(uber, is bad company)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(uber, is bad company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(uber, is bad company)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(uber, is bad company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(company, be in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(uber, is bad company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(chick, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(uber, is bad company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(oh, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(uber, is bad company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(nerd, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(uber, is bad company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(company, be in business)