uber: is is banned

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.58
, app
Weight: 0.57
, company
Weight: 0.55
, brand
Weight: 0.54
, service
Weight: 0.52
Siblings oh
Weight: 0.33
, hey
Weight: 0.33
, geek
Weight: 0.32
, nerd
Weight: 0.32
, chick
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is is banned 1.00
is banned 1.00
is is banned everywhere 0.90
be banned from pvp 0.85
be banned in japan 0.83
be banned in germany 0.83
be banned in spain 0.83
be banned in london 0.82
be banned in vancouver 0.82
be banned from london 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(uber, is is banned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(chick, is banned)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(uber, is is banned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(chick, is banned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(chick, is banned)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(uber, is is banned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(uber, is is banned)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(uber, is is banned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(uber, is banned)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(uber, is is banned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(uber, is banned)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(uber, is is banned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(uber, is banned)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(uber, is is banned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(uber, be banned in london)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(uber, is is banned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(uber, be banned in japan)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(uber, is is banned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(uber, be banned in germany)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(uber, is is banned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(uber, is banned)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(uber, is is banned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(uber, be banned in vancouver)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(uber, is is banned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(uber, be banned in london)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(uber, is is banned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(uber, be banned in germany)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(uber, is is banned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(uber, be banned in japan)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(uber, is is banned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(uber, be banned in london)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(uber, is is banned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(uber, be banned in vancouver)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(uber, is is banned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(uber, be banned in germany)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(uber, is is banned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(uber, be banned in london)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(uber, is is banned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(uber, be banned in japan)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(uber, is is banned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(uber, be banned in germany)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(uber, is is banned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(uber, be banned in japan)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(uber, is is banned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(uber, be banned in vancouver)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(uber, is is banned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(uber, be banned in vancouver)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(uber, is is banned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(uber, is is banned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(uber, is is banned)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(uber, is is banned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(uber, is is banned)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(uber, is is banned) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(chick, is banned)