uganda: be considered developing country

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents latin america
Weight: 0.59
, country
Weight: 0.58
, nation
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.55
, region
Weight: 0.54
Siblings south africa
Weight: 0.36
, saudi arabia
Weight: 0.35
, zambia
Weight: 0.35
, zimbabwe
Weight: 0.35
, central african republic
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered developing country 1.00
be categorised as developing country 0.96
is developing nation 0.92
is developing 0.89
be considered country 0.89
be called country 0.82
is country 0.80
be categorised as country 0.80
be called nation 0.77
is nation 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered developing country)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(zambia, is developing)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, is developing)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered country)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(zambia, be called country)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(zambia, be called nation)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(zambia, is country)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(saudi arabia, is country)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, is country)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(zambia, is nation)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(central african republic, is country)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered country)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(central african republic, is country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(central african republic, is country)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(zimbabwe, is country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(zimbabwe, is country)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered developing country)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(saudi arabia, is country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(saudi arabia, is country)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(zambia, is country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(zambia, is country)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(zimbabwe, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(zimbabwe, is developing)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(zambia, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(zambia, is developing)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(zambia, be called country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(zambia, be called country)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(zambia, is nation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(zambia, is nation)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(zambia, be called nation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(zambia, be called nation)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(uganda, be considered developing country)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(uganda, is developing nation)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(uganda, be categorised as developing country)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(uganda, is developing nation)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(uganda, be categorised as developing country)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(uganda, is developing nation)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(uganda, is developing)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(uganda, be categorised as developing country)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(uganda, is developing nation)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(uganda, is developing)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(uganda, is developing)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(uganda, is country)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(uganda, be categorised as developing country)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(uganda, is developing)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(uganda, is nation)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(uganda, be considered country)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(uganda, be called country)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(uganda, be called country)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(uganda, be called country)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(uganda, be considered country)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(uganda, be called nation)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(uganda, be considered country)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(uganda, be called nation)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(uganda, be called nation)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(uganda, be categorised as country)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(uganda, is country)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(uganda, be considered country)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(uganda, be called country)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(uganda, be called nation)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(uganda, is nation)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(uganda, be categorised as country)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(uganda, be categorised as country)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(uganda, be categorised as country)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(uganda, is country)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(uganda, is nation)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(uganda, is country)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(uganda, is nation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(uganda, be considered developing country)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(uganda, be considered developing country)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, be considered developing country)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, be considered country)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(central african republic, is country)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, is country)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(zambia, is developing)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, is developing)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(saudi arabia, is country)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(zambia, is country)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(zambia, be called country)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(zambia, be called nation)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(uganda, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(zambia, is nation)