uganda: is impoverished

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents latin america
Weight: 0.59
, country
Weight: 0.58
, nation
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.55
, region
Weight: 0.54
Siblings south africa
Weight: 0.36
, saudi arabia
Weight: 0.35
, zambia
Weight: 0.35
, zimbabwe
Weight: 0.35
, central african republic
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is impoverished 1.00
is poor country 0.79
is underdeveloped 0.77
be called landlocked country 0.76
is poor 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(country, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(uganda, is impoverished)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(country, is underdeveloped) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(uganda, is impoverished)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(latin america, is underdeveloped) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(uganda, is impoverished)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(uganda, is impoverished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(latin america, is underdeveloped)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(uganda, is impoverished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(country, is underdeveloped)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(uganda, is impoverished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(country, is poor)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(uganda, is impoverished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(country, is underdeveloped)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(uganda, is impoverished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(latin america, is underdeveloped)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(uganda, is impoverished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(country, is poor)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(uganda, is impoverished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(central african republic, is poor country)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(uganda, is impoverished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, is impoverished)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(uganda, is impoverished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(zambia, is underdeveloped)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(uganda, is impoverished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(zambia, be called landlocked country)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(uganda, is impoverished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, is underdeveloped)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(uganda, is impoverished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(zambia, is poor country)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(uganda, is impoverished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(zambia, is poor)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(uganda, is impoverished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(central african republic, is poor)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(uganda, is impoverished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, is poor country)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(uganda, is impoverished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, is poor)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(country, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(uganda, is impoverished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(uganda, is impoverished)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(country, is underdeveloped) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(uganda, is impoverished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(uganda, is impoverished)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(latin america, is underdeveloped) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(uganda, is impoverished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(uganda, is impoverished)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(uganda, is impoverished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(zimbabwe, is impoverished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(zimbabwe, is impoverished)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(uganda, is impoverished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(central african republic, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(central african republic, is poor country)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(uganda, is impoverished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(zimbabwe, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(zimbabwe, is poor country)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(uganda, is impoverished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(zimbabwe, is underdeveloped) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(zimbabwe, is underdeveloped)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(uganda, is impoverished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(zimbabwe, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(zimbabwe, is poor)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(uganda, is impoverished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(zambia, is underdeveloped) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(zambia, is underdeveloped)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(uganda, is impoverished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(zambia, be called landlocked country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(zambia, be called landlocked country)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(uganda, is impoverished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(zambia, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(zambia, is poor country)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(uganda, is impoverished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(central african republic, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(central african republic, is poor)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(uganda, is impoverished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(zambia, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(zambia, is poor)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(uganda, is impoverished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(uganda, is impoverished)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(uganda, is impoverished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(uganda, be called landlocked country)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(uganda, is impoverished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(uganda, be called landlocked country)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(uganda, is impoverished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(uganda, be called landlocked country)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(uganda, is impoverished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(uganda, is poor country)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(uganda, is impoverished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(uganda, is poor country)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(uganda, is impoverished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(uganda, be called landlocked country)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(uganda, is impoverished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(uganda, is poor)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(uganda, is impoverished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(uganda, is underdeveloped)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(uganda, is impoverished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(uganda, is poor country)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(uganda, is impoverished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(uganda, is poor)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(uganda, is impoverished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(uganda, is underdeveloped)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(uganda, is impoverished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(uganda, is underdeveloped)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(uganda, is impoverished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(uganda, is underdeveloped)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(uganda, is impoverished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(uganda, is poor country)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(uganda, is impoverished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(uganda, is poor)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(uganda, is impoverished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(uganda, is poor)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(uganda, is impoverished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(uganda, is impoverished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(uganda, is impoverished)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(uganda, is impoverished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(uganda, is impoverished)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(uganda, is impoverished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(latin america, is underdeveloped)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(uganda, is impoverished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(country, is underdeveloped)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(uganda, is impoverished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(country, is poor)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(uganda, is impoverished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(central african republic, is poor country)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(uganda, is impoverished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, is impoverished)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(uganda, is impoverished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(zambia, is underdeveloped)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(uganda, is impoverished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(zambia, be called landlocked country)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(uganda, is impoverished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, is underdeveloped)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(uganda, is impoverished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, is poor country)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(uganda, is impoverished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, is poor)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(uganda, is impoverished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(zambia, is poor country)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(uganda, is impoverished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(central african republic, is poor)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(uganda, is impoverished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(zambia, is poor)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(uganda, is impoverished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(latin america, is underdeveloped)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(uganda, is impoverished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(country, is underdeveloped)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(uganda, is impoverished) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(country, is poor)