ultrasound: affect society

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents technology
Weight: 0.66
, device
Weight: 0.64
, treatment
Weight: 0.61
, tool
Weight: 0.59
Siblings amniocentesis
Weight: 0.46
, implant
Weight: 0.35
, laser
Weight: 0.34
, collimator
Weight: 0.34
, scanner
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect society 1.00
affect global society 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(technology, affect society)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(ultrasound, affect society)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(ultrasound, affect society)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(technology, affect society)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(ultrasound, affect society)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(technology, affect society)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(technology, affect society)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(ultrasound, affect society)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(ultrasound, affect society)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(ultrasound, affect society)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(ultrasound, affect society)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(ultrasound, affect society)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(ultrasound, affect global society)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(ultrasound, affect society)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(ultrasound, affect global society)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(ultrasound, affect society)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(ultrasound, affect global society)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(ultrasound, affect society)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(ultrasound, affect global society)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(ultrasound, affect society)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(ultrasound, affect society)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(ultrasound, affect society)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(ultrasound, affect society)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(ultrasound, affect society)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(ultrasound, affect society)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(technology, affect society)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(ultrasound, affect society)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(technology, affect society)