ultrasound: be covered by insurance

Related concepts

Parents	technology Weight: 0.66 , device Weight: 0.64 , treatment Weight: 0.61 , tool Weight: 0.59
Siblings	amniocentesis Weight: 0.46 , implant Weight: 0.35 , laser Weight: 0.34 , collimator Weight: 0.34 , scanner Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be covered by insurance	1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(ultrasound, be covered by insurance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(implant, be covered by insurance)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(ultrasound, be covered by insurance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(implant, be covered by insurance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(implant, be covered by insurance)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(ultrasound, be covered by insurance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Salient(ultrasound, be covered by insurance)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.64

Salient(ultrasound, be covered by insurance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(ultrasound, be covered by insurance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(ultrasound, be covered by insurance)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(ultrasound, be covered by insurance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(ultrasound, be covered by insurance)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(ultrasound, be covered by insurance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(implant, be covered by insurance)