umpire: wear suits

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents coach
Weight: 0.48
, man
Weight: 0.47
, official
Weight: 0.45
Siblings referee
Weight: 0.32
, policeman
Weight: 0.31
, young man
Weight: 0.30
, captain
Weight: 0.30
, old man
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear suits 1.00
wear suit 0.94
wear suit jackets 0.93
wear jackets 0.85
wear different color shirts 0.84
wear color shirts 0.84
wear black 0.83
wear blue 0.83
wear blazers 0.81
wear yellow 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(coach, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(umpire, wear suits)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(umpire, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(coach, wear suits)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(umpire, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(coach, wear suits)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(umpire, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(policeman, wear blue)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(umpire, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(policeman, wear black)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(umpire, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(referee, wear black)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(coach, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(umpire, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(umpire, wear suits)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(umpire, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(referee, wear black)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(referee, wear black)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(umpire, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(policeman, wear black)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(policeman, wear black)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(umpire, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(policeman, wear blue)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(policeman, wear blue)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(umpire, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(umpire, wear suits)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(umpire, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(umpire, wear suit)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(umpire, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(umpire, wear suit)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(umpire, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(umpire, wear suit jackets)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(umpire, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(umpire, wear suit)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(umpire, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(umpire, wear suit)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(umpire, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(umpire, wear jackets)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(umpire, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(umpire, wear black)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(umpire, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(umpire, wear different color shirts)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(umpire, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(umpire, wear blue)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(umpire, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(umpire, wear suit jackets)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(umpire, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(umpire, wear color shirts)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(umpire, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(umpire, wear yellow)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(umpire, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(umpire, wear blazers)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(umpire, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(umpire, wear jackets)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(umpire, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(umpire, wear different color shirts)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(umpire, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(umpire, wear color shirts)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(umpire, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(umpire, wear blue)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(umpire, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(umpire, wear black)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(umpire, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(umpire, wear blazers)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(umpire, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(umpire, wear yellow)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(umpire, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(umpire, wear suit jackets)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(umpire, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(umpire, wear suit jackets)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(umpire, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(umpire, wear jackets)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(umpire, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(umpire, wear color shirts)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(umpire, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(umpire, wear different color shirts)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(umpire, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(umpire, wear jackets)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(umpire, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(umpire, wear blue)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(umpire, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(umpire, wear blazers)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(umpire, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(umpire, wear black)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(umpire, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(umpire, wear color shirts)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(umpire, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(umpire, wear yellow)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(umpire, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(umpire, wear different color shirts)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(umpire, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(umpire, wear blue)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(umpire, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(umpire, wear blazers)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(umpire, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(umpire, wear black)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(umpire, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(umpire, wear yellow)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(umpire, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(umpire, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(umpire, wear suits)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(umpire, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(umpire, wear suits)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(umpire, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(coach, wear suits)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(umpire, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(policeman, wear blue)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(umpire, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(policeman, wear black)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(umpire, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(referee, wear black)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(umpire, wear suits)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(coach, wear suits)