underwear: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents garment
Weight: 0.61
, item
Weight: 0.61
, gift
Weight: 0.59
, product
Weight: 0.58
Siblings thong
Weight: 0.62
, bra
Weight: 0.54
, basque
Weight: 0.46
, lingerie
Weight: 0.36
, pantyhose
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality cost 0.82
is higher quality 0.80
feel good 0.80
has quality availability 0.78
be good for season 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(gift, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(underwear, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(underwear, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(gift, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(underwear, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(gift, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(underwear, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(basque, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(underwear, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(thong, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(underwear, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(bra, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(underwear, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(bra, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(underwear, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(basque, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(underwear, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(thong, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(underwear, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(thong, be good for season)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(underwear, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(thong, feel good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(gift, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(underwear, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(underwear, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(underwear, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(basque, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(basque, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(underwear, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(thong, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(thong, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(underwear, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(bra, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(bra, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(underwear, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(thong, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(thong, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(underwear, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(bra, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(bra, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(underwear, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(basque, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(basque, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(underwear, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(thong, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(thong, feel good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(underwear, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(thong, be good for season) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(thong, be good for season)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(underwear, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(underwear, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(underwear, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(underwear, has quality bad)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(underwear, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(underwear, has quality bad)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(underwear, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(underwear, has quality bad)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(underwear, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(underwear, feel good)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(underwear, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(underwear, feel good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(underwear, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(underwear, has quality bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(underwear, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(underwear, feel good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(underwear, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(underwear, feel good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(underwear, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(underwear, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(underwear, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(underwear, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(underwear, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(underwear, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(gift, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(underwear, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(basque, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(underwear, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(thong, feel good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(underwear, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(thong, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(underwear, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(thong, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(underwear, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(basque, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(underwear, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(bra, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(underwear, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(bra, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(underwear, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(thong, be good for season)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(underwear, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(gift, has quality good)