underwear: have hole in front

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents garment
Weight: 0.61
, item
Weight: 0.61
, gift
Weight: 0.59
, product
Weight: 0.58
Siblings thong
Weight: 0.62
, bra
Weight: 0.54
, basque
Weight: 0.46
, lingerie
Weight: 0.36
, pantyhose
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
have hole in front 1.00
has physical part hole 0.88
get holes 0.86
has physical part holes 0.83
be left in knot hole 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(underwear, have hole in front)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(underwear, have hole in front)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(underwear, have hole in front)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(underwear, has physical part hole)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(underwear, have hole in front)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(underwear, has physical part hole)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(underwear, have hole in front)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(underwear, has physical part hole)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(underwear, have hole in front)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(underwear, has physical part holes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(underwear, have hole in front)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(underwear, has physical part hole)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(underwear, have hole in front)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(underwear, has physical part holes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(underwear, have hole in front)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(underwear, has physical part holes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(underwear, have hole in front)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(underwear, has physical part holes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(underwear, have hole in front)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(underwear, get holes)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(underwear, have hole in front)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(underwear, get holes)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(underwear, have hole in front)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(underwear, get holes)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(underwear, have hole in front)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(underwear, get holes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(underwear, have hole in front)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(underwear, have hole in front)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(underwear, have hole in front)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(underwear, have hole in front)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(underwear, have hole in front)