underwear: have little pockets

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents garment
Weight: 0.61
, item
Weight: 0.61
, gift
Weight: 0.59
, product
Weight: 0.58
Siblings thong
Weight: 0.62
, bra
Weight: 0.54
, basque
Weight: 0.46
, lingerie
Weight: 0.36
, pantyhose
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
have little pockets 1.00
has physical part pockets 0.91
have little pocket 0.90
has physical part pocket 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(underwear, have little pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(thong, have little pockets)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(underwear, have little pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(thong, has physical part pockets)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(underwear, have little pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(thong, has physical part pocket)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(underwear, have little pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(thong, have little pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(thong, have little pockets)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(underwear, have little pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(thong, has physical part pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(thong, has physical part pockets)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(underwear, have little pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(thong, has physical part pocket) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(thong, has physical part pocket)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(underwear, have little pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(underwear, have little pockets)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(underwear, have little pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(underwear, has physical part pockets)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(underwear, have little pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(underwear, has physical part pockets)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(underwear, have little pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(underwear, has physical part pockets)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(underwear, have little pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(underwear, has physical part pockets)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(underwear, have little pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(underwear, has physical part pocket)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(underwear, have little pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(underwear, has physical part pocket)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(underwear, have little pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(underwear, has physical part pocket)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(underwear, have little pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(underwear, have little pocket)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(underwear, have little pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(underwear, have little pocket)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(underwear, have little pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(underwear, have little pocket)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(underwear, have little pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(underwear, has physical part pocket)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(underwear, have little pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(underwear, have little pocket)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(underwear, have little pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(underwear, have little pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(underwear, have little pockets)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(underwear, have little pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(underwear, have little pockets)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(underwear, have little pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(thong, have little pockets)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(underwear, have little pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(thong, has physical part pockets)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(underwear, have little pockets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(thong, has physical part pocket)