underwear: was invented

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents garment
Weight: 0.61
, item
Weight: 0.61
, gift
Weight: 0.59
, product
Weight: 0.58
Siblings thong
Weight: 0.62
, bra
Weight: 0.54
, basque
Weight: 0.46
, lingerie
Weight: 0.36
, pantyhose
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
was invented 1.00
is invented 0.98
is ever created 0.75
is innovated 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(product, is innovated)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(underwear, was invented)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(underwear, was invented)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(product, is innovated)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(underwear, was invented)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(product, is innovated)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(underwear, was invented)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(bra, is invented)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(product, is innovated)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(underwear, was invented)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(underwear, was invented)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(underwear, was invented)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(bra, is invented)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(bra, is invented)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(underwear, was invented)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(underwear, was invented)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(underwear, was invented)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(underwear, is invented)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(underwear, was invented)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(underwear, is invented)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(underwear, was invented)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(underwear, is invented)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(underwear, was invented)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(underwear, is invented)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(underwear, was invented)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(underwear, was invented)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(underwear, was invented)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(underwear, was invented)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(underwear, was invented)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(underwear, was invented)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(product, is innovated)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(underwear, was invented)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(bra, is invented)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(underwear, was invented)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(product, is innovated)