unemployment: be bad for economy

Related concepts

Parents	income Weight: 0.66 , indicator Weight: 0.66 , spending Weight: 0.64 , benefit Weight: 0.63 , situation Weight: 0.63
Siblings	income tax Weight: 0.35 , poverty Weight: 0.34 , economy Weight: 0.34 , unearned income Weight: 0.33 , crisis Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be bad for economy	1.00
be good for economy	0.98
be for economy	0.95
is economy	0.93
help economy	0.91
affect economy	0.91
be known as economy	0.87
major problem in economy	0.86
exist in market economy	0.86
have effect on overall growth of economy	0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(spending, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(unemployment, be bad for economy)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(spending, be for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(unemployment, be bad for economy)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(spending, help economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(unemployment, be bad for economy)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(unemployment, be bad for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(spending, be for economy)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(unemployment, be bad for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(spending, help economy)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(unemployment, be bad for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(spending, be good for economy)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be bad for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(spending, be for economy)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be bad for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(spending, be good for economy)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be bad for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(spending, help economy)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be bad for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Remarkable(poverty, exist in market economy)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be bad for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(poverty, affect economy)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(spending, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

Remarkable(unemployment, be bad for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Plausible(unemployment, be bad for economy)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(spending, be for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

Remarkable(unemployment, be bad for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Plausible(unemployment, be bad for economy)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(spending, help economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

Remarkable(unemployment, be bad for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Plausible(unemployment, be bad for economy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(unemployment, be bad for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(poverty, affect economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(poverty, affect economy)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(unemployment, be bad for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

Remarkable(poverty, exist in market economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Plausible(poverty, exist in market economy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(unemployment, be bad for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Salient(unemployment, be bad for economy)

Similarity expansion

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(unemployment, be bad for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Plausible(unemployment, be good for economy)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.22

Salient(unemployment, be bad for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Salient(unemployment, be good for economy)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.25

Remarkable(unemployment, be bad for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be good for economy)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.42

Typical(unemployment, be bad for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Typical(unemployment, affect economy)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.42

Typical(unemployment, be bad for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(unemployment, be good for economy)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(unemployment, be bad for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Plausible(unemployment, affect economy)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.42

Typical(unemployment, be bad for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(unemployment, have effect on overall growth of economy)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.22

Salient(unemployment, be bad for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Salient(unemployment, have effect on overall growth of economy)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(unemployment, be bad for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(unemployment, have effect on overall growth of economy)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.25

Remarkable(unemployment, be bad for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, have effect on overall growth of economy)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.25

Remarkable(unemployment, be bad for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, major problem in economy)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.42

Typical(unemployment, be bad for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(unemployment, major problem in economy)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.22

Salient(unemployment, be bad for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Salient(unemployment, affect economy)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(unemployment, be bad for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(unemployment, major problem in economy)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.22

Salient(unemployment, be bad for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Salient(unemployment, major problem in economy)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.25

Remarkable(unemployment, be bad for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, affect economy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.22

Salient(unemployment, be bad for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(unemployment, be bad for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be bad for economy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.23

Plausible(unemployment, be bad for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(unemployment, be bad for economy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be bad for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(spending, be good for economy)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be bad for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(spending, be for economy)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be bad for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(spending, help economy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be bad for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Typical(poverty, affect economy)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be bad for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Typical(poverty, exist in market economy)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.42

Typical(unemployment, be bad for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(spending, be for economy)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.42

Typical(unemployment, be bad for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(spending, help economy)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.42

Typical(unemployment, be bad for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(spending, be good for economy)