unemployment: be example of macroeconomics

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents income
Weight: 0.66
, indicator
Weight: 0.66
, spending
Weight: 0.64
, benefit
Weight: 0.63
, situation
Weight: 0.63
Siblings income tax
Weight: 0.35
, poverty
Weight: 0.34
, economy
Weight: 0.34
, unearned income
Weight: 0.33
, crisis
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be example of macroeconomics 1.00
deal with economics 0.78
is macroeconomic 0.76
be y in economics 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(income, be y in economics)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(unemployment, be example of macroeconomics)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(unemployment, be example of macroeconomics)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(income, be y in economics)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be example of macroeconomics)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(income, be y in economics)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be example of macroeconomics)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(poverty, deal with economics)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(income, be y in economics)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(unemployment, be example of macroeconomics)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(unemployment, be example of macroeconomics)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(unemployment, be example of macroeconomics)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(poverty, deal with economics)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(poverty, deal with economics)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(unemployment, be example of macroeconomics)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(unemployment, be example of macroeconomics)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(unemployment, be example of macroeconomics)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(unemployment, is macroeconomic)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(unemployment, be example of macroeconomics)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(unemployment, is macroeconomic)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(unemployment, be example of macroeconomics)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(unemployment, is macroeconomic)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(unemployment, be example of macroeconomics)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, is macroeconomic)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(unemployment, be example of macroeconomics)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(unemployment, be example of macroeconomics)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be example of macroeconomics)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(unemployment, be example of macroeconomics)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(unemployment, be example of macroeconomics)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be example of macroeconomics)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(income, be y in economics)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be example of macroeconomics)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(poverty, deal with economics)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(unemployment, be example of macroeconomics)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(income, be y in economics)