unemployment: be high in michigan

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents income
Weight: 0.66
, indicator
Weight: 0.66
, spending
Weight: 0.64
, benefit
Weight: 0.63
, situation
Weight: 0.63
Siblings income tax
Weight: 0.35
, poverty
Weight: 0.34
, economy
Weight: 0.34
, unearned income
Weight: 0.33
, crisis
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be high in michigan 1.00
be high in virginia 0.85
be in georgia high 0.84
be high in california 0.83
be high in alaska 0.83
be high in west virginia 0.82
be high in europe 0.82
be high in india 0.80
be high in france 0.80
be high in uk 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be high in michigan)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in california)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be high in michigan)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in india)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be high in michigan)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in uk)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(unemployment, be high in michigan)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(income tax, be high in uk)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(income tax, be high in uk)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(unemployment, be high in michigan)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(income tax, be high in india)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(income tax, be high in india)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(unemployment, be high in michigan)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(income tax, be high in california)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(income tax, be high in california)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(unemployment, be high in michigan)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(unemployment, be high in michigan)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(unemployment, be high in michigan)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(unemployment, be high in france)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(unemployment, be high in michigan)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(unemployment, be high in france)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(unemployment, be high in michigan)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be high in france)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(unemployment, be high in michigan)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(unemployment, be high in europe)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(unemployment, be high in michigan)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(unemployment, be high in europe)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(unemployment, be high in michigan)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be high in europe)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(unemployment, be high in michigan)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(unemployment, be high in france)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(unemployment, be high in michigan)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(unemployment, be high in europe)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(unemployment, be high in michigan)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(unemployment, be high in michigan)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be high in michigan)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(unemployment, be high in michigan)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(unemployment, be high in michigan)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be high in michigan)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(income tax, be high in california)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be high in michigan)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(income tax, be high in india)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be high in michigan)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(income tax, be high in uk)