unemployment: be high in south africa

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents income
Weight: 0.66
, indicator
Weight: 0.66
, spending
Weight: 0.64
, benefit
Weight: 0.63
, situation
Weight: 0.63
Siblings income tax
Weight: 0.35
, poverty
Weight: 0.34
, economy
Weight: 0.34
, unearned income
Weight: 0.33
, crisis
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be high in south africa 1.00
be high in africa 0.95
be problem in south africa 0.92
be in sub-saharan africa 0.91
be in africa 0.91
be in places like africa 0.88
be problem in africa 0.86
be in north korea 0.86
be high in west virginia 0.85
be in africa effect 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be high in south africa)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be high in south africa)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be high in south africa)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be high in africa)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be high in south africa)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be in sub-saharan africa)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be high in south africa)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be in africa)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be high in south africa)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be problem in africa)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be high in south africa)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be in africa effect)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(unemployment, be high in south africa)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(poverty, be high in south africa)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(poverty, be high in south africa)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(unemployment, be high in south africa)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(poverty, be high in africa)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(poverty, be high in africa)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(unemployment, be high in south africa)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(poverty, be in africa)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(poverty, be in africa)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(unemployment, be high in south africa)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(poverty, be problem in africa)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(poverty, be problem in africa)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(unemployment, be high in south africa)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(poverty, be in africa effect)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(poverty, be in africa effect)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(unemployment, be high in south africa)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(poverty, be in sub-saharan africa)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(poverty, be in sub-saharan africa)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(unemployment, be high in south africa)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(unemployment, be high in south africa)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(unemployment, be high in south africa)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be problem in south africa)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(unemployment, be high in south africa)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(unemployment, be problem in south africa)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(unemployment, be high in south africa)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(unemployment, be problem in south africa)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(unemployment, be high in south africa)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(unemployment, be problem in south africa)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(unemployment, be high in south africa)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(unemployment, be high in south africa)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be high in south africa)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(unemployment, be high in south africa)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(unemployment, be high in south africa)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be high in south africa)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(poverty, be high in south africa)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be high in south africa)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(poverty, be high in africa)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be high in south africa)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(poverty, be in africa)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be high in south africa)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(poverty, be in sub-saharan africa)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be high in south africa)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(poverty, be problem in africa)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be high in south africa)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(poverty, be in africa effect)