unemployment: be low in uk

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents income
Weight: 0.66
, indicator
Weight: 0.66
, spending
Weight: 0.64
, benefit
Weight: 0.63
, situation
Weight: 0.63
Siblings income tax
Weight: 0.35
, poverty
Weight: 0.34
, economy
Weight: 0.34
, unearned income
Weight: 0.33
, crisis
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be low in uk 1.00
be high in uk 0.97
be in uk 0.93
is uk 0.93
increase in uk 0.90
fall in uk 0.90
rise in uk 0.90
fall uk 0.89
exist in uk 0.88
decrease in uk 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(spending, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(unemployment, be low in uk)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(unemployment, be low in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(spending, is uk)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be low in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(spending, is uk)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be low in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(poverty, increase in uk)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be low in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in uk)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(spending, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(unemployment, be low in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(unemployment, be low in uk)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(unemployment, be low in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(income tax, be high in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(income tax, be high in uk)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(unemployment, be low in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(poverty, increase in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(poverty, increase in uk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(unemployment, be low in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(unemployment, be low in uk)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(unemployment, be low in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be in uk)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(unemployment, be low in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(unemployment, be in uk)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(unemployment, be low in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(unemployment, be in uk)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(unemployment, be low in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(unemployment, be in uk)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(unemployment, be low in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(unemployment, fall in uk)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(unemployment, be low in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, fall in uk)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(unemployment, be low in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(unemployment, fall in uk)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(unemployment, be low in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(unemployment, fall in uk)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(unemployment, be low in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(unemployment, be low in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be low in uk)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(unemployment, be low in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(unemployment, be low in uk)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be low in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(spending, is uk)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be low in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(income tax, be high in uk)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be low in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(poverty, increase in uk)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(unemployment, be low in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(spending, is uk)