unemployment: be on hold

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents income
Weight: 0.66
, indicator
Weight: 0.66
, spending
Weight: 0.64
, benefit
Weight: 0.63
, situation
Weight: 0.63
Siblings income tax
Weight: 0.35
, poverty
Weight: 0.34
, economy
Weight: 0.34
, unearned income
Weight: 0.33
, crisis
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be on hold 1.00
have keep 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be on hold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(economy, have keep)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(unemployment, be on hold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(economy, have keep) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(economy, have keep)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(unemployment, be on hold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(unemployment, be on hold)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(unemployment, be on hold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(unemployment, be on hold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be on hold)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(unemployment, be on hold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(unemployment, be on hold)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be on hold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(economy, have keep)