unemployment: be problem in south africa

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents income
Weight: 0.66
, indicator
Weight: 0.66
, spending
Weight: 0.64
, benefit
Weight: 0.63
, situation
Weight: 0.63
Siblings income tax
Weight: 0.35
, poverty
Weight: 0.34
, economy
Weight: 0.34
, unearned income
Weight: 0.33
, crisis
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be problem in south africa 1.00
be problem in africa 0.96
be high in south africa 0.92
be problem in north america 0.92
be in sub-saharan africa 0.89
be in africa 0.89
be problem in zimbabwe 0.87
be in america problem 0.87
be in places like africa 0.87
be high in africa 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be problem in south africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be high in south africa)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be problem in south africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be high in africa)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be problem in south africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be in sub-saharan africa)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be problem in south africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be problem in africa)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be problem in south africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be in africa)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(unemployment, be problem in south africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(poverty, be problem in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(poverty, be problem in africa)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(unemployment, be problem in south africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(poverty, be high in south africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(poverty, be high in south africa)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(unemployment, be problem in south africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(poverty, be in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(poverty, be in africa)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(unemployment, be problem in south africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(poverty, be high in africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(poverty, be high in africa)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(unemployment, be problem in south africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(poverty, be in sub-saharan africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(poverty, be in sub-saharan africa)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(unemployment, be problem in south africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(unemployment, be problem in south africa)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(unemployment, be problem in south africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(unemployment, be high in south africa)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(unemployment, be problem in south africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(unemployment, be high in south africa)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(unemployment, be problem in south africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be high in south africa)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(unemployment, be problem in south africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(unemployment, be high in south africa)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(unemployment, be problem in south africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be problem in north america)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(unemployment, be problem in south africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(unemployment, be problem in north america)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(unemployment, be problem in south africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(unemployment, be problem in north america)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(unemployment, be problem in south africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(unemployment, be problem in north america)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(unemployment, be problem in south africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(unemployment, be problem in south africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be problem in south africa)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(unemployment, be problem in south africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(unemployment, be problem in south africa)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be problem in south africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(poverty, be problem in africa)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be problem in south africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(poverty, be high in south africa)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be problem in south africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(poverty, be in africa)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be problem in south africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(poverty, be high in africa)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be problem in south africa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(poverty, be in sub-saharan africa)