unemployment: be reduced

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents income
Weight: 0.66
, indicator
Weight: 0.66
, spending
Weight: 0.64
, benefit
Weight: 0.63
, situation
Weight: 0.63
Siblings income tax
Weight: 0.35
, poverty
Weight: 0.34
, economy
Weight: 0.34
, unearned income
Weight: 0.33
, crisis
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be reduced 1.00
be reduced in future 0.89
be reduced in india 0.85
be reduced in future in india 0.82
be reduced in afghanistan 0.81
decrease 0.79
be eliminated 0.77
were cut in 1964 0.77
reducing disease 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be reduced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(income tax, were cut in 1964)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be reduced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be reduced)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be reduced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be reduced in future in india)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be reduced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be reduced in afghanistan)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(unemployment, be reduced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(poverty, be reduced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(poverty, be reduced)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(unemployment, be reduced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(poverty, be reduced in future in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(poverty, be reduced in future in india)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(unemployment, be reduced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(poverty, be reduced in afghanistan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(poverty, be reduced in afghanistan)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(unemployment, be reduced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(income tax, were cut in 1964) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(income tax, were cut in 1964)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(unemployment, be reduced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(unemployment, be reduced)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(unemployment, be reduced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(unemployment, decrease)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(unemployment, be reduced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(unemployment, decrease)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(unemployment, be reduced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(unemployment, decrease)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(unemployment, be reduced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, decrease)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(unemployment, be reduced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(unemployment, be reduced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be reduced)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(unemployment, be reduced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(unemployment, be reduced)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be reduced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(poverty, be reduced)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be reduced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(poverty, be reduced in afghanistan)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be reduced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(poverty, be reduced in future in india)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be reduced) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(income tax, were cut in 1964)