unemployment: be serious problem in philippines

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents income
Weight: 0.66
, indicator
Weight: 0.66
, spending
Weight: 0.64
, benefit
Weight: 0.63
, situation
Weight: 0.63
Siblings income tax
Weight: 0.35
, poverty
Weight: 0.34
, economy
Weight: 0.34
, unearned income
Weight: 0.33
, crisis
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be serious problem in philippines 1.00
be prevalent in philippines 0.89
be rampant in philippines 0.88
exist in philippines 0.87
persist in philippines 0.86
be in india problem 0.83
be problem in usa 0.83
be peculiar problem for india 0.81
be peculiar problem in india 0.81
be peculiar problem of india 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be serious problem in philippines)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be rampant in philippines)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be serious problem in philippines)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be prevalent in philippines)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be serious problem in philippines)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(poverty, exist in philippines)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be serious problem in philippines)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(poverty, persist in philippines)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(unemployment, be serious problem in philippines)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(poverty, persist in philippines)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(poverty, persist in philippines)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(unemployment, be serious problem in philippines)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(poverty, exist in philippines)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(poverty, exist in philippines)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(unemployment, be serious problem in philippines)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(poverty, be rampant in philippines)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(poverty, be rampant in philippines)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(unemployment, be serious problem in philippines)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(poverty, be prevalent in philippines)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(poverty, be prevalent in philippines)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(unemployment, be serious problem in philippines)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(unemployment, be serious problem in philippines)

Similarity expansion

0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(unemployment, be serious problem in philippines)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be peculiar problem for india)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(unemployment, be serious problem in philippines)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be peculiar problem of india)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(unemployment, be serious problem in philippines)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be peculiar problem in india)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(unemployment, be serious problem in philippines)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(unemployment, be peculiar problem of india)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(unemployment, be serious problem in philippines)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(unemployment, be peculiar problem in india)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(unemployment, be serious problem in philippines)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(unemployment, be peculiar problem of india)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(unemployment, be serious problem in philippines)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(unemployment, be peculiar problem for india)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(unemployment, be serious problem in philippines)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(unemployment, be peculiar problem of india)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(unemployment, be serious problem in philippines)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(unemployment, be peculiar problem for india)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(unemployment, be serious problem in philippines)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(unemployment, be peculiar problem in india)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(unemployment, be serious problem in philippines)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(unemployment, be peculiar problem in india)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(unemployment, be serious problem in philippines)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(unemployment, be peculiar problem for india)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(unemployment, be serious problem in philippines)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(unemployment, be serious problem in philippines)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be serious problem in philippines)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(unemployment, be serious problem in philippines)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(unemployment, be serious problem in philippines)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be serious problem in philippines)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(poverty, exist in philippines)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be serious problem in philippines)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(poverty, be prevalent in philippines)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be serious problem in philippines)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(poverty, be rampant in philippines)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be serious problem in philippines)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(poverty, persist in philippines)