unemployment: have effect on overall growth of economy

Related concepts

Parents	income Weight: 0.66 , indicator Weight: 0.66 , spending Weight: 0.64 , benefit Weight: 0.63 , situation Weight: 0.63
Siblings	income tax Weight: 0.35 , poverty Weight: 0.34 , economy Weight: 0.34 , unearned income Weight: 0.33 , crisis Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
have effect on overall growth of economy	1.00
affect economic growth	0.89
affect economy	0.87
be for economy	0.86
be good for economy	0.86
is economy	0.85
be bad for economy	0.85
achieve economic growth	0.85
need growth	0.85
contributes to economic growth	0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(spending, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(unemployment, have effect on overall growth of economy)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(spending, be for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(unemployment, have effect on overall growth of economy)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(unemployment, have effect on overall growth of economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(spending, be for economy)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(unemployment, have effect on overall growth of economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(spending, be good for economy)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, have effect on overall growth of economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(spending, be for economy)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, have effect on overall growth of economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(spending, be good for economy)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, have effect on overall growth of economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(economy, need growth)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, have effect on overall growth of economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(economy, achieve economic growth)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, have effect on overall growth of economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(poverty, affect economy)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, have effect on overall growth of economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(economy, contributes to economic growth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(spending, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

Remarkable(unemployment, have effect on overall growth of economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(unemployment, have effect on overall growth of economy)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(spending, be for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

Remarkable(unemployment, have effect on overall growth of economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(unemployment, have effect on overall growth of economy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(unemployment, have effect on overall growth of economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(poverty, affect economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(poverty, affect economy)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(unemployment, have effect on overall growth of economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

Remarkable(economy, contributes to economic growth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(economy, contributes to economic growth)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(unemployment, have effect on overall growth of economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(economy, achieve economic growth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(economy, achieve economic growth)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(unemployment, have effect on overall growth of economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

Remarkable(economy, need growth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(economy, need growth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(unemployment, have effect on overall growth of economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Salient(unemployment, have effect on overall growth of economy)

Similarity expansion

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(unemployment, have effect on overall growth of economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Plausible(unemployment, be good for economy)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.41

Salient(unemployment, have effect on overall growth of economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Salient(unemployment, be good for economy)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.47

Remarkable(unemployment, have effect on overall growth of economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be good for economy)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.52

Typical(unemployment, have effect on overall growth of economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Typical(unemployment, affect economy)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.41

Salient(unemployment, have effect on overall growth of economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Salient(unemployment, be bad for economy)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(unemployment, have effect on overall growth of economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Plausible(unemployment, be bad for economy)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.47

Remarkable(unemployment, have effect on overall growth of economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be bad for economy)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.52

Typical(unemployment, have effect on overall growth of economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(unemployment, be good for economy)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.52

Typical(unemployment, have effect on overall growth of economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(unemployment, be bad for economy)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(unemployment, have effect on overall growth of economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Plausible(unemployment, affect economy)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.41

Salient(unemployment, have effect on overall growth of economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Salient(unemployment, affect economy)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.47

Remarkable(unemployment, have effect on overall growth of economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, affect economy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.41

Salient(unemployment, have effect on overall growth of economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(unemployment, have effect on overall growth of economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, have effect on overall growth of economy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(unemployment, have effect on overall growth of economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(unemployment, have effect on overall growth of economy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, have effect on overall growth of economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(spending, be for economy)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, have effect on overall growth of economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(spending, be good for economy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, have effect on overall growth of economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Typical(poverty, affect economy)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, have effect on overall growth of economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Typical(economy, contributes to economic growth)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, have effect on overall growth of economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(economy, need growth)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, have effect on overall growth of economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(economy, achieve economic growth)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.52

Typical(unemployment, have effect on overall growth of economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(spending, be for economy)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.52

Typical(unemployment, have effect on overall growth of economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(spending, be good for economy)