unemployment: increase in nepal

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents income
Weight: 0.66
, indicator
Weight: 0.66
, spending
Weight: 0.64
, benefit
Weight: 0.63
, situation
Weight: 0.63
Siblings income tax
Weight: 0.35
, poverty
Weight: 0.34
, economy
Weight: 0.34
, unearned income
Weight: 0.33
, crisis
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
increase in nepal 1.00
decrease in nepal 0.96
be in pakistan increasing 0.82
increase in uk 0.81
increase in singapore 0.80
be reduced in india 0.78
be reduced in afghanistan 0.76
be reduced in future in india 0.76
decrease 0.76
be eliminated from sri lanka 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, increase in nepal)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be in pakistan increasing)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, increase in nepal)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(poverty, increase in uk)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, increase in nepal)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be reduced in afghanistan)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, increase in nepal)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be reduced in future in india)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(unemployment, increase in nepal)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(poverty, be reduced in afghanistan)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(poverty, be reduced in afghanistan)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(unemployment, increase in nepal)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(poverty, be reduced in future in india)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(poverty, be reduced in future in india)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(unemployment, increase in nepal)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(poverty, increase in uk)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(poverty, increase in uk)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(unemployment, increase in nepal)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(poverty, be in pakistan increasing)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(poverty, be in pakistan increasing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(unemployment, increase in nepal)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(unemployment, increase in nepal)

Similarity expansion

0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(unemployment, increase in nepal)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(unemployment, decrease)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(unemployment, increase in nepal)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(unemployment, decrease)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(unemployment, increase in nepal)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(unemployment, decrease)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(unemployment, increase in nepal)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, decrease)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(unemployment, increase in nepal)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(unemployment, increase in nepal)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, increase in nepal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(unemployment, increase in nepal)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(unemployment, increase in nepal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, increase in nepal)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(poverty, increase in uk)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, increase in nepal)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(poverty, be in pakistan increasing)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, increase in nepal)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(poverty, be reduced in afghanistan)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, increase in nepal)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(poverty, be reduced in future in india)