unemployment: influence decisions of government

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents income
Weight: 0.66
, indicator
Weight: 0.66
, spending
Weight: 0.64
, benefit
Weight: 0.63
, situation
Weight: 0.63
Siblings income tax
Weight: 0.35
, poverty
Weight: 0.34
, economy
Weight: 0.34
, unearned income
Weight: 0.33
, crisis
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
influence decisions of government 1.00
affect government 0.79
be important to government 0.78
be important for government 0.77
be bad for government 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(indicator, be important to government)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(unemployment, influence decisions of government)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(unemployment, influence decisions of government)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(indicator, be important to government)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, influence decisions of government)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(indicator, be important to government)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, influence decisions of government)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be important for government)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(indicator, be important to government)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(unemployment, influence decisions of government)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(unemployment, influence decisions of government)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(unemployment, influence decisions of government)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(income tax, be important for government)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(income tax, be important for government)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(unemployment, influence decisions of government)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(unemployment, influence decisions of government)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(unemployment, influence decisions of government)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(unemployment, be bad for government)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(unemployment, influence decisions of government)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(unemployment, be bad for government)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(unemployment, influence decisions of government)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be bad for government)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(unemployment, influence decisions of government)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(unemployment, be bad for government)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(unemployment, influence decisions of government)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(unemployment, affect government)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(unemployment, influence decisions of government)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(unemployment, affect government)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(unemployment, influence decisions of government)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(unemployment, affect government)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(unemployment, influence decisions of government)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, affect government)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(unemployment, influence decisions of government)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(unemployment, influence decisions of government)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, influence decisions of government)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(unemployment, influence decisions of government)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(unemployment, influence decisions of government)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, influence decisions of government)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(indicator, be important to government)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, influence decisions of government)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(income tax, be important for government)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(unemployment, influence decisions of government)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(indicator, be important to government)