unemployment: is social problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents income
Weight: 0.66
, indicator
Weight: 0.66
, spending
Weight: 0.64
, benefit
Weight: 0.63
, situation
Weight: 0.63
Siblings income tax
Weight: 0.35
, poverty
Weight: 0.34
, economy
Weight: 0.34
, unearned income
Weight: 0.33
, crisis
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is social problem 1.00
be considered social problem 0.96
be cause social problem 0.95
is social issue 0.90
be social problem in america 0.89
is social 0.88
be problem in madagascar 0.88
is economic problem 0.85
has state problem 0.85
be considered problem 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(poverty, is social)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(poverty, is economic problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(poverty, be problem in madagascar)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(poverty, has state problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(unemployment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(poverty, is social)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(poverty, is social)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(unemployment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(poverty, be problem in madagascar)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(poverty, be problem in madagascar)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(unemployment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(poverty, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(poverty, has state problem)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(unemployment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(poverty, is economic problem)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(poverty, is economic problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(unemployment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(unemployment, is social problem)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(unemployment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(unemployment, is social)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(unemployment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(unemployment, is social)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(unemployment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(unemployment, is social issue)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(unemployment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(unemployment, is social issue)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(unemployment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(unemployment, is social)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(unemployment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(unemployment, is social issue)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(unemployment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, is social)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(unemployment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, is social issue)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(unemployment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(unemployment, has state problem)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(unemployment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(unemployment, has state problem)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(unemployment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, has state problem)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(unemployment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(unemployment, has state problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(unemployment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(unemployment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, is social problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(unemployment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(unemployment, is social problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(poverty, is social)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(poverty, has state problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(poverty, be problem in madagascar)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, is social problem)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(poverty, is economic problem)