unemployment: major problem in economy

Related concepts

Parents	income Weight: 0.66 , indicator Weight: 0.66 , spending Weight: 0.64 , benefit Weight: 0.63 , situation Weight: 0.63
Siblings	income tax Weight: 0.35 , poverty Weight: 0.34 , economy Weight: 0.34 , unearned income Weight: 0.33 , crisis Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
major problem in economy	1.00
is economic problem	0.90
be bad for economy	0.86
is significant problem	0.86
be biggest problem in world	0.86
be good for economy	0.85
is economy	0.85
be for economy	0.85
affect economy	0.85
help economy	0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(spending, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(unemployment, major problem in economy)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(spending, help economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(unemployment, major problem in economy)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(spending, be for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(unemployment, major problem in economy)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(unemployment, major problem in economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(spending, be for economy)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(unemployment, major problem in economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(spending, help economy)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(unemployment, major problem in economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(spending, be good for economy)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, major problem in economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(spending, be for economy)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, major problem in economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(spending, be good for economy)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, major problem in economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(spending, help economy)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, major problem in economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(poverty, is economic problem)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, major problem in economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(poverty, affect economy)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(spending, be good for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(unemployment, major problem in economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(unemployment, major problem in economy)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(spending, help economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(unemployment, major problem in economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(unemployment, major problem in economy)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(spending, be for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(unemployment, major problem in economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(unemployment, major problem in economy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(unemployment, major problem in economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(poverty, is economic problem) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(poverty, is economic problem)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(unemployment, major problem in economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(poverty, affect economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(poverty, affect economy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(unemployment, major problem in economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Salient(unemployment, major problem in economy)

Similarity expansion

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(unemployment, major problem in economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Plausible(unemployment, be good for economy)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.70

Salient(unemployment, major problem in economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Salient(unemployment, be good for economy)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.79

Typical(unemployment, major problem in economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Typical(unemployment, affect economy)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.70

Salient(unemployment, major problem in economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Salient(unemployment, be bad for economy)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(unemployment, major problem in economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Plausible(unemployment, be bad for economy)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(unemployment, major problem in economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be good for economy)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.79

Typical(unemployment, major problem in economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(unemployment, be good for economy)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.79

Typical(unemployment, major problem in economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(unemployment, be bad for economy)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(unemployment, major problem in economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be bad for economy)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(unemployment, major problem in economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Plausible(unemployment, affect economy)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.70

Salient(unemployment, major problem in economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Salient(unemployment, affect economy)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(unemployment, major problem in economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, affect economy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.70

Salient(unemployment, major problem in economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(unemployment, major problem in economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, major problem in economy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(unemployment, major problem in economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(unemployment, major problem in economy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, major problem in economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(spending, help economy)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, major problem in economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(spending, be for economy)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, major problem in economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(spending, be good for economy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, major problem in economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Typical(poverty, affect economy)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(unemployment, major problem in economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(poverty, is economic problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.79

Typical(unemployment, major problem in economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(spending, be for economy)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.79

Typical(unemployment, major problem in economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(spending, help economy)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.79

Typical(unemployment, major problem in economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(spending, be good for economy)